There is No US Embassy/Consulate/Mission in Benghazi, Libya.
There is no US consulate/embassy/mission in Benghazi.
–> http://www.usembassy.gov/ (we can even wayback this and it is not listed)
There are also many other links which confirm no such consulate or embassy ever existed. There is a US Embassy in Tripoli …. but that’s over 600 kilometres away from Benghazi. But how can that be? I mean, that’s where the mainstream media tell us the attack and heinous murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens (who is reported to have died from smoke inhalation) and 3 American Navy Seals, took place yes?
The BBC and Guardian provide a satellite image of where this mysterious consulate is supposed to be:
Daily Mail seems a little confused:
But DM finally gets the location aligned with the BBC and Guardian … however look at all those unburnt wooden desks in the middle of all the chaos.
I went into Google Earth and found the building in the satellite image – the coordinates are:
32°03’40.99″ N 20°04’52.37″ E
It does appear to be the centre (HQs?) of a military base for Operations Odessey Dawn & Unity Protector where NATO enforced the no-fly zone over Benghazi in 2011.
So If these are scuds: 32°03’28.25″ N 20°04’25.71″ E
Then these must be scuds too: 32°04’09.51″ N 20°04’53.42″ E
So it seems the US had a base with all that weaponary, a warning of an impending attack, and no troops there to protect it?
Jim Stone provides some interesting research as well:
So I want to draw your attention to some info in this next article.
I understand the US has been meddling in Syria tho, which the oilprice link makes out is not happening, but we know it is:
But what I got out of the oilprice article was the history of al-Libi, the 2nd command al-CIA-duh bloke who was droned in June (western media reported that), but only announced by a Al-CIA-duh video on a jihadi website on Sep 10th.
Al-Libi was captured in the “war on terrorism” in Afghanistan in 2002 and held for three years in Kabul’s high-security Bagram prison. Against all odds, he escaped in 2005.
In 2011 he resurfaced again, but this time as a friend to Washington who had decided that it was no longer friends with Gaddafi, despite all the efforts leading up to this to rebuild relations after that nasty Lockerbie business and all the sanctions. So here is al-Libi again, but this time around his terrorist inclinations are a bonus rather than a liability: He fights alongside intervention forces to oust Gaddafi.
With Gaddafi gone, al-Libi once again became a liability so he was taken out by a drone in Pakistan.
The attack in Libya and the “related” uprising is way bigger than than some stupid chroma-keyed and overdubbed COINTELPRO film … but everything is fine. Trust your govt.
[AQAP] stressed that “the uprising of our people in Libya, Egypt and Yemen against America and its embassies is a sign to notify the United States that its war is not directed against groups and organisations… but against the Islamic nation that has rebelled against injustice.”
The Guardian mentions US Naval Vessels off the Libya coast and Fawzi Yunis Gaddafi, the man responsible for security at the Benghazi compound.
The black flag of the Islamist Ansar al-Sharia militia continued to flutter over its base in downtown Benghazi, but the garrison was nervous, braced for reprisals after the killing of the US ambassador to Libya on Tuesday night. Many in Benghazi say Sharia played a part in the storming of the US consulate that left four Americans dead.
At the gate of the militia’s compound, a bearded commander dressed in black from head to toe said the talk inside was of two US warships that had been deployed off the Libyan coast. “There are two military boats,” he said. “Everybody is talking about it. I know they are there, what do I need to do to prove it, swim?”
The man with responsibility for security in Benghazi is Fawzi Yunis Gaddafi, who is from the same tribe as Libya’s former dictator but was imprisoned by the former regime for his political views. Chief of the Benghazi branch of the supreme security committee, the only national military force, Yunis Gaddafi said Sharia sat apart from the security apparatus.
On Tuesday night Yunis Gaddafi had taken panicked calls from American diplomats pleading for help as they were slaughtered. “I spoke to the Americans, they were saying please help us,” he said. His units arrived too late to save Stevens and his colleagues.
He said he would have had more men on duty if he had known the ambassador was inside the embattled compound. “We didn’t know the ambassador was there. It was the Americans’ fault. If we had known he was there, we would have been earlier.”
Another interesting take on who the possible perpetrators of the attack were, comes from Mark Robertson and Finian Cunningham at Global Research. Their analysis sheds light on the “Green Resistance” – loyalists to the Gaddafi regime – several of their previous attacks, and motivations for the recent attack. The article also provides some further background information about the location of the 11th September attack in Benghazi. It’s quite informative reading and makes sense considering documents stolen from the villa in Benghazi listed Libyans who were working with the Americans, and documents relating to oil contracts.
Since the savage execution of Gaddafi by rebel forces on 20th October 2011, western media sources rarely acknowledge the continued upheavel and factional fighting within the country. They would have us believe Libya is now well under the control and juristiction of a pro-US government, and that all the Libyan people appreciate the “liberation” of their country by foreign invasion. However there’s certainly plenty of video evidence to suggest the Green Resistance is still a strong and formidible force, who are even admired (at least by some Libyan residents), in regions still held by the pro-Gaddafi fighters – most notably in the South.
“How could this happen?” asked Hillary Clinton in relation to the attacks on the compound in Benghazi. Oh I dunno Hillary ….
Here Congressman Allan West says the US administration “misread the tea-leaves. They misread the whole Arab Spring. […] They cannot have their failed foreign policies seen as the reason why this occurred.”
Are they kidding? Are they seriously trying to convince us that the USG didnt see this coming? That it was a surprise? I’m just a mum sitting at home in Australia on Google search, and even I knew it was inevitable that something was going to go perilously wrong eventually.
The weapons that were used in the attack on the US “consulate/embassy” in Libya were from NATO (both US and France armed the rebels in 2011). Despite all the recent horrific unrest in the region, Libya has been the only country where attackers wielded machine-guns and rocket-propelled grenades. Despite millions being spent in an effort to retreive the arms provided to Libyan rebels last year, the country is still overrun with weapons.
“A boatload of Libyan arms — believed to be headed to Syrian rebels — was intercepted in Beirut in April. Taureg rebels in Mali used weapons obtained in Libya in their anti-government struggle this year. And there have been persistent reports and rumours of Libyan arms flowing to arms dealers and insurgents throughout Africa and the Middle East.”
The film, “Innocence of Muslims” of course has very little to do with it, except to flare up coordinated protests in Cairo which began FIRST. No doubt Islamic “religious leaders” have been infiltrated somewhat and some agent has drawn their attention to the film so they would, predictably, call for protests from the Islamic community on the Sep 11 anniversary. I’m thinking the protests were deliberately incited because US/NATO knew the Libya base was going to get attacked?
The repeated insistence by USG and mainstream media, that the film sparked the protests, has incited other protests to occur – even as far distant as India, Indonesia, and Australia. Perhaps to save face? Is it a distraction? Is it manipulation so we in the west will believe all Muslims are irrational and intolerant, and we will support a call for further intervention in the area?
Is this a Black Ops so everyone would call for war?
I am curious why attention was drawn to that film since it was only going to incite the people. This article states the demonstrators in Libya were horrified when the agitators climbed the fence and started to attack the “consulate”. Apparently it was those people who took Ambassador Christopher Stevens to the hospital when they found him:
Here is a translated video (please turn on captions) of what Libyans were saying when they found the ambassador alive.
Was there even any demonstration at the “embassy” in Libya at all?
Is EVERYONE being played? It would seem so.
Here’s some curious reports about the supposed creator of the “Innocence of Muslims.” His difficult to track identity is very convenient, wouldn’t you say? First we heard he was an Isareli Zionist, then an exhiled Egyptian born Coptic Christian living in California, USA. Apparently he had been arrested for fraud and became a Federal Informant … and at one stage he made porn films.
Even those involved in making the film say they were deceived. And it’s certainly evident to anyone who has seen the film (well, the trailer anyway) that all the offensive references to the Islamic prophet were overdubbed. The actors believed the film was about an unsavory character referred to as “Master George”.
Is it possible there may not even be a full movie at all:
Is it possible the attacks and protests have all been orchestrated as a diversion from this?
Has Israel declared war and dragged us all into it? Is it all a means to stir a rallying cry for war from the people in both the East and West?
Think about it.
Think about what the US Govt and corporate media war machine have been telling us and why.
Consider this …
Following presentation of the Northwoods plan, Kennedy removed Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, although he became Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in January 1963. American armed forces leaders began to perceive Kennedy as going soft on Cuba, and the President became increasingly unpopular with the military.
But did Kennedy manage to stop such black ops and false flags?
US has a history of attacking itself to go to war
How long are we going to keep playing this game?
Why should we continue to condone their lies and misinformation?
How many lies do they have to tell before we say enough is enough?